Showtunes!
May 22, 2013, 01:05:32 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Showtunes!  (Read 8650 times)
BillyBuerger
Nutjob
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 751


I love Mark!


View Profile WWW Email
« on: January 04, 2001, 08:43:00 am »

I asked Pipe a couple weeks ago about the Showtunes CD.  He said that they couldn't find any of them anywhere.  So he told me to have Mark make me a copy.  Thanks Mark, you Rock!

I really like this one.  Television Ruined my life, Love-Hate, Be That Way, I'm Going To Hell, Everybody in This Town is Drunk, and the Waiting Song are some of my favorites.  I heard both Love-Hate and I'm going to Hell for the first time in the past month or so.  I've never heard the Waiting Song live yet, but I like the video from the contest thing.  I'm gonna have to request it some night.

Anyways, I highly recommend this CD.  'Cept for the fact that they're out of stock right now.  If you can get your hands on this one, grab it.

Logged
briguy
King of the Geeks
Nutjob
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1166


I am Oblique And Unique!

10127907 briesy123 britre
View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2001, 01:28:00 pm »


Anyways, I highly recommend this CD.  'Cept for the fact that they're out of stock right now.  If you can get your hands on this one, grab it.[/QUOTE]

I too reccomend this cd, Sound Of Music, Big Bright World, both Pat in persons, and The Good Life/Memorial Day. Did I miss one?  

Logged

I only come back when I want to make sure that I'm still in control
Mark Lippert
The Boss
Administrator
Nutjob
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1539



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2001, 04:07:00 am »

Don't forget Songs For Young People, Intimate Pat, How To Love And Be Loved and Yipes!/A Bit Irrational.
Logged

"Wonder Twin powers, ACTIVATE!"
"Form of a bucket of water!"
"Shape of a thirsty gorilla!"
BillyBuerger
Nutjob
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 751


I love Mark!


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2001, 04:21:00 am »

Nice plug there Mark.
Logged
Eric
Quite the PatHead
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 58



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2001, 06:00:00 am »

I noticed that showtunes is still on the website. as available.  Is there a possibility of actually getting one, or ami just being hopeful
Logged
lukpac
Guest


Email
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2001, 06:09:00 am »

Quoth Eric
quote:
I noticed that showtunes is still on the website. as available.  Is there a possibility of actually getting one, or ami just being hopeful

Pat has now done a run of bootleg (ie, CD-R) copies. You can get them at the shows, and I'd assume through the website as well.
Logged
Eric
Quite the PatHead
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 58



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2001, 05:41:00 am »

thanks lukkie
Logged
Nookie Wan
Nutjob
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 375


Jedi are celibate? Screw that!!!


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: May 12, 2001, 02:19:00 pm »

Wow yeah....thanks pookie luckey dookie doo!!!

Hehee heh heee heee

"That wuz Cool"

huh huh huh huh

Logged

Applesauce BITCH!!
lukpac
Guest


Email
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2001, 07:32:00 am »

Thanks to Mark, I finally got a "real" copy of this a month or so ago. I think I've said it before, but I really like this CD. Some great songs, and a nice mix of live and studio. I think I prefer the version of Napoleon's Penis that I have from WKLH (even if it doesn't have the last verse), but...

Also, I really like the *production* on this CD. A nice crisp sound, while at the same time not sounding harsh or artificial. Probably my main problem with Fainting (and to a lesser extent, Sound Of Music and BBBWOPM) is the production. The drums (on Fainting) have that cold/boomy sound, which I don't care for. Showtunes, on the other hand, sounds really good to me. A shame Pat hasn't been able to press more copies!

Logged
Sheila
Getting obsessive
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 20



View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2001, 07:59:00 am »

I will always have a soft spot in my heart for Show Tunes for a completely egotistical reason.  (Right, Mark?)  But despite that...some of my favorite songs are on this CD.  "Me" blows me away pretty much every time I hear it.  He sings with such ferocity.  It's awesome.  I also love "Be that way" and "Love Hate".  Me and a friend of mine always referred to those songs as his "angry minor-chord songs".  They rock.
Logged
briguy
King of the Geeks
Nutjob
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1166


I am Oblique And Unique!

10127907 briesy123 britre
View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2001, 08:01:00 am »

quote:
lukpac wrote:
Thanks to Mark, I finally got a "real" copy of this a month or so ago. I think I've said it before, but I really like this CD. Some great songs, and a nice mix of live and studio. I think I prefer the version of Napoleon's Penis that I have from WKLH (even if it doesn't have the last verse), but...

Also, I really like the *production* on this CD. A nice crisp sound, while at the same time not sounding harsh or artificial. Probably my main problem with Fainting (and to a lesser extent, Sound Of Music and BBBWOPM) is the production. The drums (on Fainting) have that cold/boomy sound, which I don't care for. Showtunes, on the other hand, sounds really good to me. A shame Pat hasn't been able to press more copies!


I must agree showtunes has a very crisp sound. I bought mine at the time so mine is a very real copy. inserts and everything. I think the song order could have been better on Showtunes though. Dig the cover picture, now thats worth the $10 cover charge (or $17.98 if you bought yours new at Exclusive years back).

As far as B.B.W.O.P.M. goes, I quite liked the production on this CD. It was crisp, but not too crisp. One thing to note is that the two we are talking about here are mastered quite different from Sound Of Music or Good Life or PIP. Technology and hearing has greatly improved as far as CD's go, and actually I remastered my copy of Sound Of Music myself to try to get some more punch out of it. Sound Forge does a great job of this and my remaster has the same levels now as Showtunes and Fainting. It is a little better now.

This goes for alot of recordings transfered to CD by deaf money grubbing engineers who have no context of true listening to music. Thats why alot of vinyl sounds so good to most. I am sure Luke has more to add here being a fan of older 60's music and esspecially Beatles stuff.


Logged

I only come back when I want to make sure that I'm still in control
lukpac
Guest


Email
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2001, 08:44:00 am »

quote:
briguy wrote:
As far as B.B.W.O.P.M. goes, I quite liked the production on this CD. It was crisp, but not too crisp. One thing to note is that the two we are talking about here are mastered quite different from Sound Of Music or Good Life or PIP. Technology and hearing has greatly improved as far as CD's go, and actually I remastered my copy of Sound Of Music myself to try to get some more punch out of it. Sound Forge does a great job of this and my remaster has the same levels now as Showtunes and Fainting. It is a little better now.

I might as well just post some notes on each CD:

- Good Life - Sounds really good to me. Nice production, pretty good CD transfer.

- Memorial Day - It sounds to me like the original recording had a fair amount of tape hiss on it, and whoever mastered the CD decided to use some noise reduction to try to remove it. Only problem is it left a "haze" over some songs and hardened up the sound. I'd be curious to hear what the master sounds like...

- Sound Of Music - I don't know if it's the fact that this is an all digital recording, or just the way it was mixed/mastered, but this one has a very harsh sound to it. "Let's jack that treble up"...

- PIP - Sounds very good to me.

- Showtunes - As above - sounds good to me.

- BBBWOPM - The sound quality itself is fine (not overly harsh), but I'm not thrilled with the production. Well, the "live" tracks sound good, but the studio tracks have kind of a hollow/metallic sound to them.

- PIP2 - Again, sounds good to me. I think some of the assembly is a bit sloppy, but it's no big deal.

- Fainting - Basically the same as BBBW. The sound quality itself seems fine, but the production seems to have a cold/hollow sound to it. Almost like that "bathroom" sound - make sense?

quote:
This goes for alot of recordings transfered to CD by deaf money grubbing engineers who have no context of true listening to music. Thats why alot of vinyl sounds so good to most. I am sure Luke has more to add here being a fan of older 60's music and esspecially Beatles stuff.

Well, there's two basic reasons why many CDs sound bad:

1) The use of poor source tapes. Many early CDs were mastered from tapes meant for the production of LPs. These tapes were copies of the masters (sometimes a few generations down) that had additional EQ to facilitate the cutting of LPs (rolled off bass, for example).

2) Many mastering engineers don't know what they are doing. LPs are somewhat forgiving and can mask bad mastering. CDs, on the other hand, will basically reproduce what you give them. Feed in a bad master and you'll get a bad sounding CD. Also, there was a tendency to jack up the treble, which caused things to sound thin and harsh.

Then of course there's the issue of using poor digital processing and noise reduction. Lots of people seem to dislike tape hiss, but the fact is that removing it via digital NR actually makes things sound *worse*. Also, while most mastering engineers don't do it, you generally get better results by doing your mastering (ie, EQ) in analog and not going digital until the very last step. While you you don't loose any information (ie, sound quality) when doing a digital *copy*, the same can't be said about digital processing. Every time you adjust something digitally you're doing a floating point calculation, and stuff gets rounded off. Before long those round-off errors start to add up...

Logged
briguy
King of the Geeks
Nutjob
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1166


I am Oblique And Unique!

10127907 briesy123 britre
View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2001, 09:50:00 am »

Luke has written some good and accurate stuff here so I will add within the quote just so it makes some sort of sense to the reader.

quote:
lukpac wrote:
Well, there's two basic reasons why many CDs sound bad:

"1) The use of poor source tapes. Many early CDs were mastered from tapes meant for the production of LPs. These tapes were copies of the masters (sometimes a few generations down) that had additional EQ to facilitate the cutting of LPs (rolled off bass, for example)."

Agreed. And I might add alot of the tapes were stored improperly and have degraded. Acetate and rust do not last forever. The RIAA curve is the biggest detriment ever to be invented. It actually was only needed because commercial vinyl was so crappy in the 70's due to the petroleum scare, that it was the only way to get decent playback. Not good or excellent, decent. Most record companies in an effort to push things out for fast $$$ did nothing but pull the common LP master and punch a CD. It is good things have changed a little in the record world. As far as Pat goes, I have a feeling Sound of Music used some of the LP eq'ing in it's production in the Studio and was originally only on Cassette tape. You take a tape mastered for eventual cassette/lp only production and theres your answer.


"2) Many mastering engineers don't know what they are doing. LPs are somewhat forgiving and can mask bad mastering. CDs, on the other hand, will basically reproduce what you give them. Feed in a bad master and you'll get a bad sounding CD. Also, there was a tendency to jack up the treble, which caused things to sound thin and harsh."

I disagree here. Lp's have the sound there, your equipment changes what you get as an end result. CD's on the otherside sound the same no matter what you do. I personally master things off my large LP colletion (6,000 +) and get great results. Better than CD's purchased later that are the remastered, super duper versions. A local note. I just recently mastered all my Couch Flambeau LP's to one CD. Since Jay Tiller is a lazy bum, and won't put his stuff out on Cd, or let anyone else handle the masters he has, this is the only way you get it on CD is to do it yourself. With care, and brians you can get a nice quiet good sounding CD all on your own. Never depend on the record Companies to do it right. They did jack up the treble though to get that clarity out of an LP, Rap guys do it too but on both ends. Boom Siss Hiss Boom  [/quote]

"Then of course there's the issue of using poor digital processing and noise reduction. Lots of people seem to dislike tape hiss, but the fact is that removing it via digital NR actually makes things sound *worse*. Also, while most mastering engineers don't do it, you generally get better results by doing your mastering (ie, EQ) in analog and not going digital until the very last step. While you you don't loose any information (ie, sound quality) when doing a digital *copy*, the same can't be said about digital processing. Every time you adjust something digitally you're doing a floating point calculation, and stuff gets rounded off. Before long those round-off errors start to add up..."

I agree again here. The digital process is best saved for the end. where you want your end result perfect. Digital NR and such is a non forgiving medium and does not allow for human touch, which of course is what it is all about. Music is a feeling and digital has the inherent logical quality of being non-feeling. Like a robot. But now we digress to the Flux Capacitor theory.[/QUOTE]

And last my opinion on the Pat CD collection,

The Good Life- A very 80's local sound. hissy, but I bought for the music. I would rather have the Cd, then try to get something good out of the cassette version.

Memorial Day - this was a bit better, and I have to forgive any album slapped together quick. This has some good Pat writing and preforming and if you don't have it, get it. It is worth it and never mind the quality of sound. You won't notice it.

Sound of Music- like I said, low levels mastered for lp/cassette release. Remaster it on your own, it will sound very good. The source is a loose dry mix and was Pats early work. But look how many songs you still hear Pat play off it and the requests off it? again worth your while despite the sound.

PIP 1 - this was my first Pat CD. The sound here is good for a live CD, production was not all that good and sound is a live preformance. If you are looking for serious listening here, forget it. This is a Car CD and a party CD. But the songs her, you may not hear ever agaim. Note: "michael stipe"

Showtunes - good crisp prodiction. Te internal angry Pat is full force here. No 60's reference to the sound, and very moderen sounding. "Me" in fact was too loud. Distortion on the cymbals. But, the vocals are very clear, you can hear the man breath. It is one that gives you serious listening pleasure and I was very surprised it did not sell better back in 1995 when it came out.
Perhaps it was too expensive or two angry, or Pat didn't play enough stuff off it like he did for Fainting. Any comments?

Big Bright World- I call this the "post Popular Pat" cd. Screw you, Goofy Town, ect is here and the Studio stuff is well recorded. No distortion, but does have a slightly hollow sound at some points. Sittin in Church, and I don't come From No Monkey have this present. The live stuff breaks thing up too much and should have been saved for PIP 2. More studio stuff would have been nice here instead of Screw You, and I Was High.


PIP 2- Lots of live favorites here. It again is a good car or party Cd, and the recording is advanced over PIP 1. Still a live recording though. I usually go to a Pat show over listening to this CD and bring it along for Pat Virgin friends to hear as we drive to the show. 9-out of 10 times "ruin my life" and "Sex And Beer" gets played and they have a song they are familiar with and can sing along.

Fainting With Hapiness- The stand out song here is "Antiques". The rest are good, but midway through you find yourself thinking "isn't that the solo from umm that beatles song.. umm there are places... no wait! in my life" I got it the first time though being a big Beatles fan. But mimic is the highest form of flattery and Pat does flatter the Beatles in his effort to mimic on Fainting while still maintaining originality. Sound is like Luke said, echo'y and wet, and drowns alot of detail. I also found the mix punched which doesn't work well with a wet sound. But I think this was in an effort to get that early 60's feel to it. In any case, good writing and if you don't have theses all, get em..

MP3's on web site- for poor compressed mixes off a sound board, surprisingly alot of these are good. "It's All About Me"(sometimes)", Started Out With a Bang", "I'm Yours", "Be Free (it's up too you"," Sittin On A Hill" all on one CD. D/L them all and judge for yourself, but none of them beat the live preformance.

Bootleg CD's- These are great and worth the price, but don't expect studio quality. They are boots off various shows. But buy em. Little plug for the masters there lol

Thats it. Phew! I better go to work, get drunk and go to sleep.

Logged

I only come back when I want to make sure that I'm still in control
lukpac
Guest


Email
« Reply #13 on: June 21, 2001, 10:24:00 am »

"And I might add alot of the tapes were stored improperly and have degraded."

True, although I think most are in better shape than most people think. From the people I've talked to, tapes from the '50s are often in great shape, while it's those from the '70s and '80s that are having problems. They used to use whale oil as a lubricant on tapes, but that was replaced with something synthetic in the '70s. Over time the tapes get sticky and the oxide comes off easily if you're not careful. The "solution" is to bake the tapes in an oven (at a low heat) for a few hours. I'm not kidding!

"The RIAA curve is the biggest detriment ever to be invented. It actually was only needed because commercial vinyl was so crappy in the 70's due to the petroleum scare, that it was the only way to get decent playback."

Two things to keep in mind: 1) The RIAA curve is not applied on the master tape, but rather through the LP cutting head. If you played back a tape that actually had the RIAA curve on it it would sound *terrible*! 2) The RIAA curve has been around since the dawn of LP - it didn't have anything to do with vinyl shortages or the '70s. In the days of 78s, there was no set EQ curve. With LPs the RIAA curve became standard.

"I disagree here. Lp's have the sound there, your equipment changes what you get as an end result. CD's on the otherside sound the same no matter what you do."

Well, that's not true. Equipment *does* matter. Perhaps not as much as LP, but... While I can't say I've had first-hand experience, a lot of people *swear* by tube equipment.

Also, like I've said, who mastered the CD in the first place can make a huge difference. Steve Hoffman at DCC Compact Classics does wonders with old recordings, getting that "natural" sound on CD. He calls it the "breath of life." When Steve does a remaster, it's almost *always* an improvement over all previous versions, even if recent "remastered" versions have come out.

"They did jack up the treble though to get that clarity out of an LP, Rap guys do it too but on both ends."

Well, I hate rap:-0 Besides, on a lot of older recordings, there simply aren't any frequencies on that tape above 12-14 khz - all you're doing is increasing hiss and noise by jacking up the treble.

"Digital NR and such is a non forgiving medium and does not allow for human touch, which of course is what it is all about."

Well, the problem with digital NR is it is *impossible* to completely distinguish hiss ("bad") from music (good). No matter what you do, at least some of that musical information will be lost. Often some of the high end gets lost, which in turn makes engineers turn up the treble. That results in a very harsh, lifeless recording.

"Sound of Music- like I said, low levels mastered for lp/cassette release. Remaster it on your own, it will sound very good. The source is a loose dry mix and was Pats early work. But look how many songs you still hear Pat play off it and the requests off it? again worth your while despite the sound."

I see you've mentioned "low levels" a few times. This really isn't a problem. The worst thing is that you'll have to turn your stereo up a notch. What's much worse is when people jack the levels up on CDs, getting rid of any sense of dynamic range. Unfortunately, more and more CDs are being mastered like this today. Open the files in an audio editor and you won't see peaks and valleys, but rather a bit black bar...

"PIP 1 - this was my first Pat CD. The sound here is good for a live CD, production was not all that good and sound is a live preformance. If you are looking for serious listening here, forget it. This is a Car CD and a party CD. But the songs her, you may not hear ever agaim. Note: "michael stipe""

Personally, I think the recording is pretty good. Not to mention the fact that I got Pat to play Michael Stipe a few months ago...:-0

In case it's not already obvious, I do quite like all the *music* on Pat's CDs. I just find the production/sound quality end to be lacking in a few places...

Logged
Dave
Getting obsessive
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 34



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #14 on: June 21, 2001, 12:56:00 pm »

Whew, you all must be tired from all the typing above...

No disrespect to all the intelligent and well informed answers and thoughts above, but I have a great suggestion for all of Pat's CDs...

Put em in, turn em up, and enjoy some great music that all too few are able to hear because Pat is confined to such a small audience overall...

Is that Freedom Rock?  Turn it up!!!!

Keep on churning out some great songs Pat!!!!

Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.12 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!